Glassbox VA · geography

What VA reports spending in each state, next to what the award record shows.

VA's National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics publishes the Geographic Distribution of VA Expenditures (GDX) every year. This page lines it up, state by state and category by category, with the obligations VA reported to USAspending.gov — only where the two measure the same programs. In FY2025, the compared categories cover $204.5B of the $339.8B GDX reports for the states, DC, Puerto Rico and Guam; USAspending shows $204.4B for the same categories (100.0%).

USAspending comparable · FY2025

USAspending obligations in the compared categories (crosswalked assistance listings and construction contracts).

Quintile breaks for this year
  • $0–$900M
  • $900M–$1.8B
  • $1.8B–$2.9B
  • $2.9B–$5.1B
  • $5.1B+
  • Not compared

Source: VA NCVAS GDX FY2025 (GDX_FY25.xlsx) · USAspending.gov award data archive (VA, agency 036), net obligations by action-date FY · states, DC, Puerto Rico and Guam · figures by state in the table below.

FY2025 at a glance
Compared state × category cells within tolerance (all compared categories, construction included)
204 of 205
Variances to review
1 in 1 state

GDX FY2025: Prepared by the National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics, September 2026 · GDX_FY25.xlsx. USAspending transactions loaded for all 12 months of FY2025: assistance yes, contracts yes.

GDX expenditure
VA's estimate of money spent in the fiscal year, by state (an expenditure measure, closer to outlays than to obligations; VA notes it can differ from both), from VA's Geographic Distribution of VA Expenditures report.
USAspending obligations
Net obligations recorded on USAspending.gov in the same fiscal year (sum of every transaction's federal action obligation), for the programs mapped to the same GDX category.
Coverage ratio
USAspending ÷ GDX. 100% means the award record accounts for the same dollars VA reports as spent. Obligations and expenditures are different measures, so exact agreement is not expected.
National · FY2025

Category by category

National figures sum every GDX geography (including rows VA lists as other territories, foreign or unknown). The tolerance band is set per category from the spread of all states' ratios; the national ratio shows definitional and timing differences that move every state together and therefore flag none.
CategoryGDX expenditureUSAspending obligationsNational ratioTolerance band (median)StatesComparability
Compensation & Pension$187.0B$187.0B100.0%100.0%–100.0% (100.0%)53 within · 0 to reviewCompared
Education & Vocational Rehabilitation/Employment$15.2B$15.2B100.2%99.8%–100.6% (100.2%)53 within · 0 to reviewCompared
Insurance & Indemnities$517M$536M103.7%98.9%–108.6% (103.2%)49 within · 0 to reviewCompared
Construction$1.8B$1.7B94.7%3.0%–5675% (147.6%)49 within · 1 to reviewPartly comparable (directional)
Medical Care$132.8B———Not comparableNot compared
Loan Guaranty$1.0B———Not comparableNot compared
Memorial Benefits$1.6B———Not comparableNot compared
Variances to review · FY2025

Where the two sources differ beyond tolerance

Each row is a state and category whose ratio sits outside the band set by all states that year, by at least 5 points and $1M. The structural explanation lists the known reasons two correct datasets differ; none is a finding.
StateCategoryGDXUSAspendingRatioStructural explanation
District of ColumbiaConstruction$222M$6.0M2.7%Construction is obligated up front and spent over several years; single-year ratios swing with project phasing. National and headquarters contracts are often performed or booked in the Washington, D.C. area. USAspending below GDX can reflect items GDX draws from VA's financial systems that have no award row, or rows without a usable state.
All states · FY2025

The figures behind the map

The same data as the map, for screen readers and for checking. Select a state for its category detail and multi-year trend.
GDX expenditures and USAspending obligations by state for FY2025, compared categories only, with coverage ratio, reconciliation gap (construction excluded) and variance count.
StateGDX total (all categories)GDX, comparedUSAspending, comparedCoverage ratioGap ($), excl. constructionGap (share)Variances to review
Alabama$7.4B$4.9B$5.0B101.2%$535K0.01%0 of 4
Alaska$1.3B$751M$752M100.1%$22Kunder 0.01%0 of 3
Arizona$8.6B$5.0B$5.0B99.5%$1.3M0.03%0 of 4
Arkansas$4.2B$2.4B$2.4B100.3%$553K0.02%0 of 4
California$28.9B$17.1B$17.0B99.6%$2.4M0.01%0 of 4
Colorado$6.6B$4.3B$4.3B99.2%$1.5M0.04%0 of 4
Connecticut$2.2B$1.1B$1.1B101.6%$392K0.04%0 of 4
Delaware$991M$613M$628M102.6%$66K0.01%0 of 4
District of Columbia$1.1B$463M$247M53.3%$23Kunder 0.01%1 of 3
Florida$29.1B$18.1B$18.2B100.7%$4.0M0.02%0 of 4
Georgia$14.0B$9.5B$9.6B100.7%$2.0M0.02%0 of 4
Guam$270M$180M$180M100.0%$00%0 of 2
Hawaii$2.0B$1.3B$1.3B100.1%$125Kunder 0.01%0 of 4
Idaho$2.3B$1.3B$1.3B99.8%$235K0.02%0 of 4
Illinois$8.5B$4.5B$4.5B100.5%$1.5M0.03%0 of 4
Indiana$5.6B$3.0B$3.0B100.6%$820K0.03%0 of 4
Iowa$2.8B$1.4B$1.5B101.6%$420K0.03%0 of 4
Kansas$3.0B$1.7B$1.8B105.6%$193K0.01%0 of 4
Kentucky$5.2B$3.0B$2.7B89.3%$553K0.02%0 of 4
Louisiana$5.0B$2.9B$2.9B100.0%$823K0.03%0 of 3
Maine$1.9B$1.1B$1.1B98.8%$215K0.02%0 of 4
Maryland$6.2B$4.1B$4.1B100.7%$1.3M0.03%0 of 4
Massachusetts$4.6B$2.3B$2.3B101.0%$1.4M0.06%0 of 4
Michigan$7.7B$4.3B$4.3B101.0%$1.2M0.03%0 of 4
Minnesota$4.8B$2.4B$2.4B99.8%$767K0.03%0 of 4
Mississippi$3.7B$2.2B$2.2B103.3%$445K0.02%0 of 4
Missouri$7.3B$3.8B$3.7B99.4%$1.0M0.03%0 of 4
Montana$1.7B$904M$900M99.5%$252K0.03%0 of 4
Nebraska$2.2B$1.3B$1.3B100.0%$350K0.03%0 of 4
Nevada$4.6B$2.7B$2.8B102.8%$501K0.02%0 of 4
New Hampshire$1.4B$756M$764M101.1%$352K0.05%0 of 4
New Jersey$4.0B$2.5B$2.5B100.0%$598K0.02%0 of 4
New Mexico$2.8B$1.6B$1.6B100.4%$256K0.02%0 of 4
New York$9.6B$5.1B$5.0B99.1%$1.8M0.04%0 of 4
North Carolina$15.2B$10.0B$10.1B100.3%$1.7M0.02%0 of 4
North Dakota$814M$442M$455M103.0%$47K0.01%0 of 4
Ohio$10.6B$5.4B$5.4B100.0%$1.1M0.02%0 of 4
Oklahoma$6.2B$4.1B$4.0B99.0%$419K0.01%0 of 4
Oregon$4.8B$2.5B$2.5B100.0%$297K0.01%0 of 4
Pennsylvania$9.9B$5.3B$5.4B101.5%$1.5M0.03%0 of 4
Puerto Rico$2.7B$1.6B$1.6B98.9%$104Kunder 0.01%0 of 4
Rhode Island$895M$494M$492M99.6%$116K0.02%0 of 4
South Carolina$8.1B$5.3B$5.4B100.2%$1.8M0.03%0 of 4
South Dakota$1.3B$624M$660M105.8%$247K0.04%0 of 4
Tennessee$8.9B$5.5B$5.5B100.4%$1.0M0.02%0 of 4
Texas$35.6B$24.0B$23.9B99.5%$4.3M0.02%0 of 4
Utah$2.2B$1.4B$1.4B99.5%$835K0.06%0 of 4
Vermont$577M$269M$269M100.0%$234K0.09%0 of 3
Virginia$13.1B$9.4B$9.4B100.1%$1.6M0.02%0 of 4
Washington$8.0B$5.2B$5.1B99.3%$1.2M0.02%0 of 4
West Virginia$2.9B$1.4B$1.4B99.9%$543K0.04%0 of 4
Wisconsin$5.3B$2.7B$2.6B99.7%$699K0.03%0 of 4
Wyoming$970M$461M$481M104.4%$110under 0.01%0 of 3
← Transparency dashboard
Source: VA NCVAS GDX FY2025 · USAspending.gov award data archive (VA, agency 036)