The dataset shows awards whose first action falls inside a SAM.gov exclusion period for the same recipient — matched by UEI, or by normalised name and state at lower strength.
Glassbox VA surfaces correlations and observations, not findings of misconduct. Severity is the size of the match (dollars, growth ratio, concentration or firm count), not the likelihood of a problem; evidence strength (0–1) shows how well the data supports the match. Both are a starting point for review, not a verdict.
The match meets the pattern threshold, in the lower size band.
A mid-sized match. Pull the source records and read the listed benign explanations first.
The largest size band for this pattern. Larger matches are listed first; size is not evidence of a problem.
Severity is computed from the detection signal · sam.exclusion active_date ≤ first_action_date ≤ COALESCE(termination_date, ∞) · match on exclusion.uei = recipient_uei (strong) or exclusion.name_norm = normalised recipient_name AND exclusion.state = recipient_state (weak, penalised) · firm classifications only · obligated_total ≥ $10K · signal = net obligations $
The dataset shows contract VA553EXPRESSPROSACTONRENTALSFY11 to ACTON RENTAL & SALES COMPANY (553-DETROIT; $60,000 net obligations) first actioned on 2010-10-01, inside a SAM.gov exclusion period (1989-10-24 → indefinite; Prohibition/Restriction, HHS) recorded against the same UEI GRE2JG1EDDN9.
Why this may be benign · Not every exclusion bars every award: some are limited to one program or agency (nonprocurement exclusions under 2 CFR 180 are a different regime from FAR 9.4 procurement debarment), awards may proceed under a compelling-reason determination (FAR 9.405(a)), and agencies may continue contracts in existence when the contractor was excluded (FAR 9.405-1).
Once a match is identified, the dataset suggests these review actions. Glassbox VA does not prescribe outcomes — these are calibrated options for contracting officers, auditors, and program officers, framed as correlations to investigate.
UEI matches identify the same registrant. Name + state matches can be different firms: compare CAGE code, address and principals first.
Awards to an excluded party require a written compelling-reason determination by the agency head's designee. Orders under contracts awarded before the exclusion may continue.
Some exclusions are limited to a program, agency or type of transaction; read the exclusion type and excluding agency on SAM.gov.
These are calibrated suggestions, not directives. The dataset shows the pattern; the responsible officials decide the response.
Aggregated from the matches below. Severity bands are calibrated per pattern; counts and dollar totals reflect this snapshot only.